Post 2: Maxims
Question:
Grice’s (1975) cooperative principle
assumes that people cooperate in the process of communication in order to
reduce misunderstandings. In order to comply with this principle, speakers need
to follow a number of sub principles or maxims.
a) Define each of these maxims.
b) Explain the differences between
‘quietly violating’ a maxim and ‘openly flouting’ a maxim?
Answer:
Paul Grice, an English Philosophe introduce
the concept of the cooperative principle in his article “Logic and Conversation”
(Syntax and Semantics, 1975). Grice believes that human beings will be
conversational cooperative when they communicate. As humans, we are social
beings that requires communication to socialise, when we talk we assume without
realising and so as the person we are talking to. To achieve mutual
conversational ends, we cooperate.
Grice argued that for someone to interpret
what is said by other person, some kind of cooperative principle is assumed to
be in operation which are commandments that people tacitly follow to further
the conversation effectively and that is the four sub-principles he called
maxims. The four maxims humans follow to be cooperative and understood formulated
by Grice are Maxim of Quality, Maxim of Quantity, Maxim of Relation and Maxim
of Manner.
I) Maxim of Quality
As speaker, truth must be prioritised. Do not
lie or state something that is not provable by adequate evidence.
Example of the following rule:
Ahmad: Where were you this morning during briefing?
Aminah: I was absent due to being late.
In the example, Aminah tells the truth about her whereabouts to Ahmad.
II) Maxim of Quantity
Speaker must provide nothing less or more than
the conversation requires. Be informative by providing helpful amount of
information.
Example of the following rule:
Ahmad: Are you going to class tomorrow?
Aminah: No
In the example, Aminah responded to Ahmad by providing straight answer without
adding any other information.
III) Maxim of Relation
Speaker has to be relevant by stating things
that are pertinent to the conversation.
Example of the following rule:
Ahmad: When is your birthday?
Aminah: I was born on October 31st
In the example, Aminah provide accurate information that is relevant to
Ahmad’s question.
IV) Maxim of Manner
As Speaker, statements must be clear, brief
and orderly as possible and avoid being obscure and ambiguous.
Example of the following rule:
Ahmad: Why are you moody today?
Aminah: I failed my math test and forgot to bring my
purse.
In the example, Aminah responded by providing brief reason to why she’s
moody without exaggerating.
b) Differences between ‘quietly
violating’ a maxim and ‘openly flouting’ a maxim
I) Quietly Violating a Maxim
According to Grice (1975), Violation takes
place when speaker intentionally refrain to apply certain maxims in their
conversation to cause misunderstanding or to achieve other purpose. In a simple
form, quietly violating a maxim refers to the speaker lying or refuse to tell
the truth by avoiding to answer the question directly.
Example of quietly violating a Maxim:
Ahmad: Have you finished your part for the group
assignment?
Aminah: I’m so hungry, aren’t you? Let’s have Lunch.
In the example, Aminah doesn’t answer Ahmad’s question instead she responded
with another question that is not relevant to the conversation. It is certain
that Aminah change the topic because she is trying to evade the interrogation
posed by Ahmad.
II) Openly Flouting a Maxim
Unlike quietly violating a maxim, openly
flouting a maxim is When speaker have no intention to deceive or mislead
hearer. Speaker may flout the maxim so as to deliver implicitly a sarcastic
tone in what they state.
Example of openly flouting a Maxim:
Ahmad:
That’s the nicest outfit
I’ve seen in my entire life.
Aminah: I woke up late today, I had no time to find
anything else.
In the example, it is obvious that Ahmad is teasing Aminah on her choice
of outfit and his purpose wasn’t to praise Aminah. Aminah notice the purpose of
Ahmad’s sarcasm and in return explain why she was wearing the outfit.
I believe that to ensure miscommunication or misunderstanding in communication does not occur, it is significant that we follow Grice's Maxims in our daily life as it guides us on ways to obtain information that we Inquire.
I believe that to ensure miscommunication or misunderstanding in communication does not occur, it is significant that we follow Grice's Maxims in our daily life as it guides us on ways to obtain information that we Inquire.
It is a simple explanation that can make me understood well about this topic. In fact, Grice's maxims play an important role in our daily conversation, it help us to convey message clearly to others. So, we have try to avoid quietly violating or open flouting in our conversation to avoid misunderstanding.
ReplyDeleteThis is a clear and concise way of explaining the questions asked above. The examples rings true to most of us as well. After this, I guarantee all of us will be hesitant to quietly violate a maxim in regards to assignments and such.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your explanation with those relevant examples, I get to know how this four maxims work in our daily life. Grice's maxims help us to reduce misunderstanding in conversations and lead us to the right way. Other than that, we still do in that way even though we knew we are flouting or violating the maxims, because indeed sometimes we need to express our feeling or ask question in an indirect way, but thanks to Grice's maxims, it's not only help us to reduce misunderstanding, but also make our stands clearer to other listener in the conversation.
ReplyDeleteYour blog analysis is very accurate, and very detailed, the whole is very clear, I can clearly understand the four ways, and write quite well.
ReplyDelete